Since picking up the camera again lately and re-immersing in photography I have wanted to find a good film format to shoot in. I have tried many different things since I first picked up a cheap camera over a decade ago. 35mm film of course, in all it's varieties (color, slide, black and white, cross processing, dark room developing, etc.), some medium format, various cameras (cheap point and shoots, SLR's, TLR's, rangefinders), SX-70 Polaroid, I even shot a box of 4x5 Fuji Astia once which is really pretty (too bad I sent my favorite shot into a a skateboard mag and never got it back). Of course, I have shot with a digital SLR for about the past 5 years, first with a Pentax *ist DL which I really liked, and now I have a new Canon Rebel T3i.
You will hear people say this kind of stuff all the time so I hate to hash through it again, but film is just cooler than digital in many ways. When it comes to many applications digital is just as great or identical (or better) in performance to film... for example I love digital for shooting skateboard photos. It's also great for standard portraiture and all sorts of commercial applications, and anything you really want. Fact is, as much as some people try and make it seem that way, there are no rules in photography besides physics. So whatever you like is what's right.
That said, the fun thing about film is the unique interaction you get between your camera and film of choice. There are so many options here. We could make a big list of all sorts of photographic niches that people love. One that I particularly like is 35mm cross processed slide film shot in a small compact camera. This is popular among users of the Lomo LC-A, but there are so many cameras that you can get for cheap that are just as, if not more satisfying. I used an Olympus XA a lot (I sold it though!).
Let me get to my point: I have been wanting to find a fun format to mess with. I think I'd really like to shoot black and white film and do the darkroom thing, but you need space and such for that. Cross processing slide film is fun but it's sort of a hassle waiting while you mail it off to be developed. I don't know what sparked it in my mind first, but I wanted to maybe shoot some large format film again... but this is sort of cost prohibitive. Then I remembered the old Polaroid folding cameras you can find at thrift shops sometimes. Most people are familiar with the Polaroid 600 series that spits out a roughly square picture on a white rectangle frame... everybody thinks you need to shake it to make it develop faster. It's pop culture. Polaroid discontinued this stuff a few years ago... but some people purchased old equipment and are making films for them again (it's called The Impossible Project). I guess Polaroid also recently brought out a new camera system called the Polaroid 300, probably due to demand from people who missed the old stuff. Fact is, the 300 series pictures are smaller (they look cute though) and are actually made by Fuji. It's just rebranded as a Polaroid.
Anyways, in my thrifting adventures I found a Polaroid 360 Land camera, one of the better Polaroid folding cameras out there. It came in a box with the original flash and charger for the flash. I bought a battery for the camera, and the shutter worked. I purchased new NiCad cells to refurbish the flash... the flash charged up and I mounted it to the camera. Unfortunately, although the flash appears to cycle up all the juice it needs, it doesn't fire. I have a feeling it's an issue with the camera not triggering rather than the flash itself.
I wanted to get film for the camera, and since I didn't have the option of using the flash I chose Fuji FP-3000B which is a fast speed black and white film. Only Fuji makes film for these cameras anymore, Polaroid also discontinued that as well! Polaroid fails, Fuji wins.
I ordered four boxes of film, which is about $10 a box... you get 10 shots per pack so it's basically $1 a shot. I thought I would be somewhat judicious and try and ration it, but one thing led to another and I ended up shooting it all in a day. It's SO addictive. The unique stuff about this film, compared to the 600 series integral film most people are familiar with, is that you have to manually pull it out of the camera, wait a short period of time, and then peel it apart. One side is your print, and the other side is the negative, which you typically throw away (although people have found use for these negatives using various techniques).
Anyways, I will quit talking and show you all the decent photos I shot!
First shot test. Some speakers* and a party sign.
(*I got four Realistic MC-1000 speakers a few weeks ago, another addition to my collection I have dubbed 'Speaker Town')
My dad.
And again.
Bike photos are cliche but this pack film turns anything into art, especially in black and white.
Cruise boat on the Columbia river. When you pull the film you need to pull it with even pressure because it is popping open a small pouch of developing chemicals. Obviously I didn't get an even pull so the developing was light and dark in spots. The errors can be charming though.
Howling coyote ;)
What self respecting photographer who grew up in Richland, WA hasn't taken a photo or nine of this dumb old elephant slide at Howard Amon park. Pretty cliche if you live here... but dang, it just looks so good shot on Polaroid pack film!
Joe setting up a board at Mosaik skate shop in Richland, WA.
That's supposed to be Keri but it's super back lit.
And this is the point it all went down hill... 'Hey let's take a photo of you ollieing my bike!' I rode by the skatepark and saw Chris McFarland and Hermiston Joe and next thing you know I was on the skateboard photo train which is a real wormhole, especially when film of any kind is involved.
I think this one was a botched attempt but I can't remember... looks like he might be catching a kickflip but he was just trying to ollie it. (He did actually land it several times though)
The timing was difficult with the bike on flat ground so we moved it over to a bump to get some floatier shots so the timing for me would be easier. I ended up taking several... none are quite perfect and they all have elements that I like...
I like this one a lot but I think I took it too early...
Pretty bad pull on this one, but the silhouette looks boss.
Chopped and it's got lens flare, but it looks cool.
Still a bit chopped and flared but this one is pretty great. Which one is your favorite?
Hermiston Joe.
Frontside 5-0, sometimes the bad pulls look cool I think.
Chris McFarland
Lien to tail.
All together now!
Synchronized front bluntslides.
I still had one pack of film left at this point but couldn't let well enough alone, so I decided to do some self portraits. The camera doesn't focus particularly close and doesn't have a built in self timer... that stick in the background is what I am about to use to hit the button at a distance.
I didn't mean to look so serious or mad, I was actually just trying to concentrate. I like the background on this. I also like that you can see that I am using the stick.
I seriously did try taking some shots where I was smiling a little but they looked all kinds of goofy so I did not scan them in.
This is the best one I think.